4.6 Article

Predictors of mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: The impact of cytomegalovirus disease and lymphopenia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1629-1641

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15769

Keywords

antibiotic drug resistance; clinical research; practice; infection and infectious agents - bacterial; infectious disease; organ transplantation in general

Funding

  1. ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH)
  2. Sociedad Andaluza de Trasplante de Organo Solido (SATOT)
  3. Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. Subdireccion General de Redes y Centros de Investigacion Cooperativa
  6. Innovacion y Universidades
  7. Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases [RD16/0016/0008, RD16/0016/0001, RD16/0016/0002, RD16/0016/00010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections in solid organ transplant recipients is challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a specific score to predict mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections. A multinational, retrospective (2004-2016) cohort study (INCREMENT-SOT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02852902) was performed. The main outcome variable was 30-day all-cause mortality. The INCREMENT-SOT-CPE score was developed using logistic regression. The global cohort included 216 patients. The final logistic regression model included the following variables: INCREMENT-CPE mortality score >= 8 (8 points), no source control (3 points), inappropriate empirical therapy (2 points), cytomegalovirus disease (7 points), lymphopenia (4 points), and the interaction between INCREMENT-CPE score >= 8 and CMV disease (minus 7 points). This score showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.88) and classified patients into 3 strata: 0-7 (low mortality), 8-11 (high mortality), and 12-17 (very-high mortality). We performed a stratified analysis of the effect of monotherapy vs combination therapy among 165 patients who received appropriate therapy. Monotherapy was associated with higher mortality only in the very-high (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% CI 1.13-7.06, P = .03) and high (HR 9.93, 95% CI 2.08-47.40, P = .004) mortality risk strata. A score-based algorithm is provided for therapy guidance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available