4.4 Article

Comparison of prescribing patterns before and after implementation of evidence -based opioid prescribing guidelines for the postoperative urologic surgery patient

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 220, Issue 2, Pages 499-504

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.037

Keywords

Opioids; Postoperative; Pain; Guidelines; Epidemic

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We developed evidence -based guidelines for postoperative opioid prescribing after urologic surgery and assessed changes in prescribing after implementation. Methods: Prescribing data for adults who underwent 21 urologic procedures were used to derive a four - tiered guideline for postoperative opioid prescribing. This was implemented on January 1, 2018, and prescribing patterns including quantity of opioids prescribed (oral morphine equivalents; OME) and re fill rates were compared between patients undergoing surgery prior to (January -April, 2017; n equals 1732) and after (January -April, 2018; n equals1376) implementation. Results: The median OME (IQR) prescribed was signi ficantly lower for 2018 compared with 2017 [100 (0; 175) versus 150 (60; 225); p < .0001]. The median prescribed OME decreased in 14/21 procedures (67%). The re fill rates did not signi ficantly change. Guideline adherence rates after implementation, based on individual procedures, ranged from 33 to 95%. Conclusions: Fewer opioids were prescribed after implementing a prescribing guideline. Additional study is required to assess patient opioid utilization. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available