4.2 Article

Parents Matter: Examination of Family Presence in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 10, Pages 1023-1030

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701506

Keywords

neonatal intensive care unit; fathers; mothers; presence; family-centered care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that parents are present for a small percentage of the time their infants are hospitalized in the NICU, with the father being the most common first family member at the bedside. In addition, the presence of fathers, grandmothers, and grandfathers with their infants in the NICU was negatively correlated with infants' total length of stay, while this was not seen for mothers.
Objective The aim of this study is to examine presence trends for parents and family members during an infant's Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization. Study Design We conducted a review of 386 infants hospitalized in a Level IV NICU in the Northwestern United States between June 2013 and April 2014 to quantitatively examine presence trends. Results Infants were visited by multiple family members. The father was the most common first family member at the bedside after admission. Parents were present over half of the days their infants were in the NICU (medians: mothers 75% and fathers 59%), but a relatively small percentage of the total hospitalization time (medians: 10% mothers and 5% fathers). Fathers', grandmothers', and grandfathers' presence with their infants in the NICU were negatively correlated with infants' total length of stay in the NICU. This finding was not replicated for mothers. Female family members were present in the NICU more than male family members. Conclusion Parents are present a small percent of the time their infants are hospitalized in the NICU. NICU based methods to improve family presence may lead to improved patient and family centered care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available