Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 5, Pages 605-612Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz201
Keywords
Children; Pediatric; Delta check; Preanalytical error; Sample mix-up; Wrong blood in tube
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: Preanalytical processes in pediatric patients are generally manual and associated with a higher risk of error. The optimized delta check rules for detecting misidentified children samples are examined. Methods: Relative difference and absolute different delta check limits were applied on original and reshuffled (to simulate sample mislabeling/mix-up) paired deidentified pediatric results of 57 laboratory tests. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of a range of delta check limits were determined. The delta check limit associated with the highest accuracy was considered optimal. Results: In general, the delta check limits had poor to moderate accuracy (0.50-0.81) in detecting misidentified patient samples. The sensitivity (rule out misidentified sample) quickly deteriorated at increasing delta check limits. At the same time, the specificity (rule in misidentified sample) of the delta check limit was also low. The performance of the relative difference and absolute difference delta check rules was similar. Conclusions: Our findings showed poor delta check performance in the pediatric population. The high false-positive flag rate may lead to wasteful resource-intensive investigations and delay in result reporting. In addition, we observed that the optimized pediatric delta check correlated strongly with within-subject biologic variation, whereas delta check accuracy correlated poorly with index of individuality.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available