4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Do Sustainability Standards Benefit Smallholder Farmers Also When Accounting For Cooperative Effects? Evidence from Cote d'Ivoire

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 681-695

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajae.12015

Keywords

Certification; cocoa; cooperatives; Cote d'Ivoire; Fairtrade; sustainability standards

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) through the GlobalFood Program [RTG 1666]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [ME 5179/1-1]
  3. foundation Fiat Panis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although many studies analyzed effects of sustainability standards-such as Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance-on smallholder farmers in developing countries, most did not sufficiently account for systematic differences between certified and noncertified farmers. Certified farmers are typically organized in cooperatives. When sampling only from a small number of cooperatives, as previous studies did, it is not easy to disentangle certification effects from possible cooperative effects. Here, we address this shortcoming by randomly sampling from a large number of cooperatives, thus better capturing existing institutional heterogeneity. In particular, we collect and use data from cocoa farmers in Cote d'Ivoire who are organized in Fairtrade-certified and noncertified cooperatives. Regression models with instrumental variables show that Fairtrade has positive and significant effects on cocoa yields, prices, and living standards. These effects remain significant also after controlling for cooperative characteristics, but the magnitude of the estimates changes. We draw two conclusions. First, in Cote d'Ivoire, Fairtrade certification benefits farmers economically. Second, and more generally, cooperative characteristics are jointly correlated with certification and relevant outcomes, which needs to be accounted for to avoid bias when evaluating the benefits of sustainability standards in the small farm sector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available