4.4 Article

Threshold investment and firm viability: Evidence from commercial poultry farms in Nigeria

Journal

AGRIBUSINESS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 422-439

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/agr.21639

Keywords

Africa; commercial poultry enterprises; food systems transformation; income dynamics; Nigeria; threshold investments

Funding

  1. United States Agency for International Development
  2. AgBio Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapidly increasing demand for animal protein in many countries in the Global South has generated an expansion of the poultry subsector. This sector is typically diverse, ranging from small backyard farms to commercial farms of varying sizes. As the subsector expands, little is known about the performance or viability of different sizes of operation. Is there a minimum investment required to establish a viable commercial farm? Focusing on Nigeria, Africa's largest economy and most populous country, this study uses nonparametric statistics, transition matrices, and parametric estimations to identify the equilibrium poultry farm size. We find consistent evidence of multiple equilibria, particularly a high- and low-stable equilibrium separated by a threshold between small and large farms. Farms are highly likely to remain in the size category in which they begin; small poultry farms are unlikely to cross the threshold and transition to large ones. We also find that larger farms are better able to withstand a price shock than smaller farms, which are more likely to cease operations in the event of a shock. These underlying dynamics should be given due consideration by governments, donors and private sector as they enter the industry or encourage others to engage in it [EconLit citations: O12-Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development, L11-Production, Pricing, and Market Structure center dot Size Distribution of Firms, Q12-Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available