4.6 Article

Insulin-like growth factor-1 enhances neuroprotective effects of neural stem cell exosomes after spinal cord injury via an miR-219a-2-3p/YY1 mechanism

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages 12278-12294

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.102568

Keywords

spinal cord injury (SCI); microRNAs (miRNAs); exosomes; apoptosis

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC1101500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672332]
  3. Key Science and Technology Support Foundation of Tianjin City [17YFZCSY00620]
  4. Major Project of Tianjin Science and Technology Military and Civilian Integration [18ZXJMTG00260]
  5. Project of Tianjin Rescue Medicine Clinical Center [15ZXLCSY00040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains the most common cause of paralysis, and there are no effective therapies for SCI patients. Neural stem cell (NSC)-derived exosomes can attenuate apoptosis and neuroinflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury, but the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we examined the efficacy of miRNAs isolated from exosomes as treatments for SCI and characterized their mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we evaluated the effects of exosomes formed in the presence of insulin growth factor-1 (IFG-1, IGF-Exo), which promotes neural proliferation and regeneration, as well as normal exosomes (Nor-Exo) and compared control and H2O2-treated groups both in vitro and in vivo. Using microRNA sequencing and qRT-PCR, we identified miR-219a-2-3p, levels of which were higher in the IGF-Exo than Nor-Exo group and played crucial anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptosis roles. Additional experiments revealed that IGF-Exo inhibits YY1 expression through up-regulation of miR-219a-2-3p. This in turn inhibits the NF-KB pathway, partly inhibiting neuroinflammation and promoting the neuroprotective effects after SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available