4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Towards precision medicine-based therapies for glioblastoma: interrogating human disease genomics and mouse phenotypes

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2908-7

Keywords

Glioblastoma; Drug repositioning; Cancer genomics; Mouse phenotype

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA152371, R01 CA155676] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [DP2 HD084068] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive brain tumors. It has poor prognosis even with optimal radio-and chemo-therapies. Since GBM is highly heterogeneous, drugs that target on specific molecular profiles of individual tumors may achieve maximized efficacy. Currently, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) projects have identified hundreds of GBM-associated genes. We develop a drug repositioning approach combining disease genomics and mouse phenotype data towards predicting targeted therapies for GBM. Methods: We first identified disease specific mouse phenotypes using the most recently discovered GBM genes. Then we systematically searched all FDA-approved drugs for candidates that share similar mouse phenotype profiles with GBM. We evaluated the ranks for approved and novel GBM drugs, and compared with an existing approach, which also use the mouse phenotype data but not the disease genomics data. Results: We achieved significantly higher ranks for the approved and novel GBM drugs than the earlier approach. For all positive examples of GBM drugs, we achieved a median rank of 9.245.6 of the top predictions have been demonstrated effective in inhibiting the growth of human GBM cells. Conclusion: We developed a computational drug repositioning approach based on both genomic and phenotypic data. Our approach prioritized existing GBM drugs and outperformed a recent approach. Overall, our approach shows potential in discovering new targeted therapies for GBM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available