4.8 Article

Construction of Chiral, Helical Nanoparticle Superstructures: Progress and Prospects

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 41, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201905975

Keywords

chiral nanoparticles; helical nanoparticle assembly; nanomaterials; plasmonic chiroptical activity

Funding

  1. University of Pittsburgh
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR 1904960]
  3. University of Pittsburgh Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences through Andrew W. Mellon fellowship
  4. University of Pittsburgh Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences through Arts and Sciences graduate research fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chiral nanoparticle (NP) superstructures, in which discrete NPs are assembled into chiral architectures, represent an exciting and growing class of nanomaterials. Their enantiospecific properties make them promising candidates for a variety of potential applications. Helical NP superstructures are a rapidly expanding subclass of chiral nanomaterials in which NPs are arranged in three dimensions about a screw axis. Their intrinsic asymmetry gives rise to a variety of interesting properties, including plasmonic chiroptical activity in the visible spectrum, and they hold immense promise as chiroptical sensors and as components of optical metamaterials. Herein, a concise history of the foundational conceptual advances that helped define the field of chiral nanomaterials is provided, and some of the major achievements in the development of helical nanomaterials are highlighted. Next, the key methodologies employed to construct these materials are discussed, and specific merits that are offered by each assembly methodology are identified, as well as their potential disadvantages. Finally, some specific examples of the emerging applications of these materials are discussed and some areas of future development and research focus are proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available