4.4 Article

Factors associated with rapid improvement in visual acuity in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy after gene therapy

Journal

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages E730-E733

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14379

Keywords

disease progression; gene therapy; Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy; visual acuity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of the People's Republic of China [81770969]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To analyse the factors associated with rapid and significant improvement in visual acuity in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) after gene therapy and explain the theory of this improvement. Methods We recruited 149 patients with LHON, who underwent gene therapy, and divided them into two groups according to the absence or presence of rapid and significant visual acuity improvements within 3 days of treatment. A bivariate logistic regression model was used to analyse relevant factors including age, the period between onset and treatment, baseline values of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field index (VFI) and pretreatment average retinal nerve fibre-layer thickness (GRNFL). The corresponding parameters for the injected and non-injected eyes were analysed separately. Results The period between onset and treatment, and pretreatment baseline BCVA was significantly associated with rapid and significant improvement in visual acuity for both, the injected and non-injected eyes. Moreover, pretreatment baseline VFI and GRNFL were not significantly associated with rapid and significant improvement in visual acuity. Age was significantly associated with rapid and significant improvement in visual acuity of the injected eyes. Conclusion The period between onset and treatment, and pretreatment baseline BCVA may be important predictors of rapid and significant improvement in visual acuity in patients with LHON after gene therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available