4.7 Article

Phase prediction in high entropy alloys with a rational selection of materials descriptors and machine learning models

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 528-539

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.067

Keywords

High entropy alloys; Machine learning; Genetic algorithm; Active learning; Materials informatics

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0700505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671157]
  3. Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Materials informatics employs machine learning (ML) models to map the relationship between a targeted property and various materials descriptors, providing new avenues to accelerate the discovery of new materials. However, the possible ML models and materials descriptors are numerous, and a rational recipe to rapidly choose the best combination of the two is needed. In the present study, we propose a systematic framework that utilizes a genetic algorithm (GA) to efficiently select the ML model and materials descriptors from a huge number of alternatives and demonstrated its efficiency on two phase formation problems in high entropy alloys (HEAs). The optimized classification model allows an accuracy for identifying solid-solution and non-solid-solution HEAs to be up to 88.7% and further for recognizing body-centered-cubic (BCC), face-centered-cubic (FCC), and dual-phase HEAs to reach 91.3%. Furthermore, by employing an active learning approach, several HEAs with largest classification uncertainties were selected, experimentally synthesized and phase-identified, and augmented to the initial dataset to iteratively improve the ML model. The method serves as a general algorithm to select materials descriptors and ML models for various material problems including classification and optimization of targeted properties. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available