4.7 Article

Equilibrium viscosity and structural change in the Cu47.5Zr45.1Al7.4 bulk glass-forming liquid

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 69-78

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.039

Keywords

Bulk metallic glasses; Viscosity; Phase separation; Nanocrystal; Kinetic fragility

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51601129, 51775386]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low temperature viscosities of Cu47.5Zr45.1Al7.(4) glass-forming liquid are measured by thermomechanical analysis in three-point beam bending mode. The experimental equilibrium values are fitted with the Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann (VFT) function, and the fragility parameter of the supercooled liquid is determined to be D* = 20.6. Viscosity measurements during isothermal annealing at 710 K show an initial relaxation from the glassy state into the supercooled liquid, followed by an anomalous viscosity increase of about two orders of magnitude. In-situ transmission electron microscope (TEM) and spherical aberration-corrected TEM investigations reveal that the effects of primary crystallization, nanoscale decomposition and structural ordering might be responsible for the anomalous viscosity behavior. The change in dynamic properties of the supercooled liquid, which is reflected by the larger VFT fitting parameter D* = 41.9 of the new annealed state reached before the final crystallization, is suggested to be not only related to the nanoscale structure change, but may also be caused by the change in chemical composition of the new annealed glass due to the primary crystallization. Furthermore, possible mechanisms for the nanoscale phase separation and the formation of atomic clusters are discussed based on the results of high-resolution TEM experiments. (C) 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available