4.8 Article

Bismuth-Antimony Alloy Nanoparticle@Porous Carbon Nanosheet Composite Anode for High-Performance Potassium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 1018-1026

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b08526

Keywords

potassium-ion battery; bismuth-antimony alloy anode; potassiation/depotassiation reaction mechanism; carbon composite nanosheet; energy storage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672188]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [16JCYBJC40900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antimony (Sb)-based anode materials have recently aroused great attention in potassium-ion batteries (KIBs), because of their high theoretical capacities and suitable potassium inserting potentials. Nevertheless, because of large volumetric expansion and severe pulverization during potassiation/depotassiation, the performance of Sb-based anode materials is poor in KIBs. Herein, a composite nanosheet with bismuth-antimony alloy nanoparticles embedded in a porous carbon matrix (BiSb@C) is fabricated by a facile freeze-drying and pyrolysis method. The introduction of carbon and bismuth effectively suppress the stress/strain originated from the volume change during charge/discharge process. Excellent electrochemical performance is achieved as a KIB anode, which delivers a high reversible capacity of 320 mA h g(-1) after 600 cycles at 500 mA g(-1). In addition, full KIBs by coupling with Prussian Blue cathode deliver a high capacity of 396 mA h g(-1) and maintain 360 mA h g(-1) after 70 cycles. Importantly, the operando X-ray diffraction investigation reveals a reversible potassiation/depotassiation reaction mechanism of (Bi,Sb) <-> K(Bi,Sb) <-> K-3(Bi,Sb) for the BiSb@C composite. Our findings not only propose a reasonable design of high-performance alloy-based anodes in KIBs but also promote the practical use of KIBs in large-scale energy storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available