4.8 Article

Rational Construction of Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks for Uranium(VI) Extraction: The Strong Periodic Tendency with a Metal Node

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 14087-14094

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c02121

Keywords

periodic tendency; rare earth MOFs; adsorption; uranium; ionic radii

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11775037, 21777161, 21836001, 21806167]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2017020]
  3. Science Challenge Project [TZ2016004]
  4. Major Basic Research Project of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [19KJA150001]
  5. Center for Actinide Science and Technology, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0016568]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been reported as important porous materials for the potential utility in metal ion separation, coordinating the functionality, structure, and component of MOFs remains a great challenge. Herein, a series of anionic rare earth MOFs (RE-MOFs) were synthesized via a solvothermal template reaction and for the first time explored for uranium(VI) capture from an acidic medium. The unusually high extraction capacity of UO22+ (e.g., 538 mg U per g of Y-MOF) was achieved through ion-exchange with the concomitant release of Me2NH2+, during which the uranium(VI) extraction in the series of isostructural RE-MOFs was found to be highly sensitive to the ionic radii of the metal nodes. That is, the uranium(VI) adsorption capacities continuously increased as the ionic radii decreased. In-depth mechanism insight was obtained from molecular dynamics simulations, suggesting that both the accessible pore volume of the MOFs and hydrogen-bonding interactions contribute to the strong periodic tendency of uranium (VI) extraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available