4.8 Article

Enhanced Neural Regeneration with a Concomitant Treatment of Framework Nucleic Acid and Stem Cells in Spinal Cord Injury

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 2095-2106

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b19079

Keywords

spinal cord injury; tetrahedral framework nucleic acid; neural stem cells; translation; regeneration; animal model

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0110600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81970916, 81671031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal cord injury (SCI), began with a primary injury including contusion and compression, is a common disease caused by various pathogenesis. Characterized disruption of axons and irreversible loss of neurons in SCI, and further damage in spinal cord tissue caused by following secondary injuries, such as the formation of glial scar and inflammation, makes it even harder to recover for affected patients. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid (tFNA), which possesses the capability of promoting neuroprotection and neuroregeneration in vitro, might alleviate the injuries, and facilitate the neural tissue regeneration in experimental animal models of SCI. Here, we developed a concomitant treatment of tFNA and neural stem cells (NSCs) for the synergistic therapy in treating the injury of the spinal cord. We first observed that tFNA could promote cell proliferation of NSCs then verified that the concomitant treatment of tFNA and NSCs showed the neuroprotective actions by increasing the survival of transplanted NSCs. Furthermore, the recovery of motor function and the tissue regeneration in the lesion site of the spinal cord achieved the best performance in the SCI rats treated with the combination of tFNA and NSCs than others, and the formation of glial scar was the least. Our findings provide novel evidence of a promising strategy for synergistic treatment of SCI in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available