4.7 Article

Effect of Freezing on Photosystem II and Assessment of Freezing Tolerance of Tea Cultivar

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants8100434

Keywords

Camellia sinensis; freezing tolerance; freezing sensitivity; overwintering; photosynthesis system; tea breeding

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170643]
  2. China Agriculture Research System (Tea) [CARS-19]
  3. Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2752016C02053-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Freezing tolerant tea cultivars are urgently needed. The tea cultivars with highly freezing tolerance showed resistance to freezing stress induced photoinhibition. Freezing sensitivity index (H) of 47 tea clonal cultivars was investigated after severe freezing winter in 2016. To develop instrumental methods for freezing tolerance selection, the maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm) and leaf color indicator a on the Hunter color scale were determined on control group (non-frozen) and frozen group (being frozen at -15 degrees C for 2 h and then stood at 20 degrees C for 5 h) of the cultivars. When the two indicators were expressed as the ratios (R-Fv/Fm and R-a) of frozen group to control group, linear regression of the freezing sensitivity index (H) upon the R-Fv/Fm and R-a produced significant relationship respectively, i.e., H = 60.31 - 50.09 R-Fv/Fm (p < 0.01) and H = 30.03 - 10.82 R-a (p < 0.01). Expression of gene psbA encoding D1 protein and gene psbD encoding D2 protein in PSII showed that the frezzing tolerant tea cultivars maintained a high expression level of psbA after freezing stress, which is considered to be beneficial to de novo synthesis of D1 protein and sustaining PSII activity. These findings can provide instrumental tools for assessing freezing tolerance of tea cultivars in tea breeding program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available