4.6 Article

Rapid Bacterial Community Changes during Vermicomposting of Grape Marc Derived from Red Winemaking

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7100473

Keywords

winery wastes; earthworms; microbial communities; bacterial succession; core microbiome; vermicompost

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTM2013-42540-R, AGL2017-86813-R]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [ED431F 2018/05, ED431B 2019/038]
  3. Programa Ramon y Cajal (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) [RYC-2016-21231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies dealing with changes in microbial communities during vermicomposting were mostly performed at lab-scale conditions and by using low-throughput techniques. Therefore, we sought to characterize the bacterial succession during the vermicomposting of grape marc over a period of 91 days in a pilot-scale vermireactor. Samples were taken at the initiation of vermicomposting, and days 14, 28, 42, and 91, representing both active and mature stages of vermicomposting. By using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing, significant changes in the bacterial community composition of grape marc were found after 14 days and throughout the process (p < 0.0001). There was also an increase in bacterial diversity, both taxonomic and phylogenetic, from day 14 until the end of the trial. We found the main core microbiome comprised of twelve bacterial taxa (similar to 16.25% of the total sequences) known to be capable of nitrogen fixation and to confer plant-disease suppression. Accordingly, functional diversity included increases in specific genes related to nitrogen fixation and synthesis of plant hormones (salicylic acid) after 91 days. Together, the findings support the use of grape marc vermicompost for sustainable practices in the wine industry by disposing of this high-volume winery by-product and capturing its value to improve soil fertility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available