4.7 Article

Design of Novel Haptens and Development of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Immunoassays for the Simultaneous Detection of Tylosin and Tilmicosin in Milk and Water Samples

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom9120770

Keywords

hapten; monoclonal antibody; immunoassay; tylosin; tilmicosin

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development of China [2018YFC1602904]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871887]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201704020082]
  4. Key Scientific Research Projects of Guangdong Provincial Universities and Colleges [2018KZDXM011]
  5. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2018B030314005]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Project of the Guangxi [2017AB47020]
  7. Graduate Student Overseas Study Program of South China Agricultural University [2019LHPY003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a monoclonal antibody-based indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (icELISA) was established to detect tylosin and tilmicosin in milk and water samples. A sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody was prepared by rational designed hapten, which was achieved by directly oxidizing the aldehyde group on the side chain of tylosin to the carboxyl group. Under the optimized conditions, the linear range of icELISA for tylosin and tilmicosin were 1.3 to 17.7 ng/mL and 2.0 to 47.4 ng/mL, with half-maximal inhibition concentration (IC50) values of 4.7 and 9.6 ng/mL, respectively. The cross-reactivity with other analogues of icELISA was less than 0.1%. The average recoveries of icELISA for tylosin and tilmicosin ranged from 76.4% to 109.5% in milk and water samples. Besides, the detection results of icELISA showed good correlations with HPLC-MS/MS. The proposed icELISA was satisfied for rapid and specific screening of tylosin and tilmicosin residues in milk and water samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available