4.4 Article

Gamma-ray bursts as cool synchrotron sources

Journal

NATURE ASTRONOMY
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 174-179

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0911-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. DFG cluster of excellence `Origin and Structure of the Universe'
  3. DFG [SFB 1258]
  4. University of Rijeka through the Erasmus+ programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most energetic electromagnetic sources in the Universe, releasing 10(42)-10(47) J (refs. (1,2)) in prompt gamma-ray radiation. Fifty years after their discovery, the physical origin of this emission is still unknown. Synchrotron emission has been an early contender(3,4), but was criticized because spectral fits of empirical models suggest too hard a slope of the low-energy power law, violating the so-called synchrotron line-of-death(5,6), and for its inefficient extraction of energy when the electrons are not fully cooled, reviving models of photospheric emission(7-9). Fitting proper synchrotron spectra(10) (rather than heuristic functions) and taking electron cooling into account was shown to work for several GRB spectra(10-14). Here, we show that idealized synchrotron emission, when properly incorporating time-dependent cooling of the electrons, is capable of fitting similar to 95% of all time-resolved spectra of single-peaked GRBs observed by Fermi's Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. Thus, the past exclusion of synchrotron radiation as an emission mechanism derived via the line-of-death was misleading. Our analysis probes the microphysical processes operating within these ultra-relativistic outflows and provides estimates of magnetic field strengths and Lorentz factors of the emitting region directly from spectral fits. The resulting parameter distributions are largely compatible with theoretical spectral(15-17) and outflow predictions(18). The emission energetics implied by the observed, uncooled electrons remain challenging for all theoretical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available