4.7 Review

GWAS: Fast-forwarding gene identification and characterization in temperate Cereals: lessons from Barley - A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 119-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.013

Keywords

Association mapping; Hordeum vulgare L; Gene identification; QTL mapping; Barley breeding, GWAS

Funding

  1. Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) core budget

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the genetic complexity of traits is an important objective of small grain temperate cereals yield and adaptation improvements. Bi-parental quantitative trait loci (QTL) linkage mapping is a powerful method to identify genetic regions that co-segregate in the trait of interest within the research population. However, recently, association or linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) became an approach for unraveling the molecular genetic basis underlying the natural phenotypic variation. Many causative allele(s)/loci have been identified using the power of this approach which had not been detected in QTL mapping populations. In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), GWAS has been successfully applied to define the causative allele(s)/loci which can be used in the breeding crop for adaptation and yield improvement. This promising approach represents a tremendous step forward in genetic analysis and undoubtedly proved it is a valuable tool in the identification of candidate genes. In this review, we describe the recently used approach for genetic analyses (linkage mapping or association mapping), and then provide the basic genetic and statistical concepts of GWAS, and subsequently highlight the genetic discoveries using GWAS. The review explained how the candidate gene(s) can be detected using state-of-art bioinformatic tools. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available