4.6 Article

Facet-dependent active sites of a single Cu2O particle photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to methanol

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages 957-968

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0490-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Nanoscale Materials, a US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC0206CH11357]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) from Argonne National Laboratory
  4. Office of Science, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering
  6. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-AC0206CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atomic-level understanding of the active sites and transformation mechanisms under realistic working conditions is a prerequisite for rational design of high-performance photocatalysts. Here, by using correlated scanning fluorescence X-ray microscopy and environmental transmission electron microscopy at atmospheric pressure, in operando, we directly observe that the (110) facet of a single Cu2O photocatalyst particle is photocatalytically active for CO2 reduction to methanol while the (100) facet is inert. The oxidation state of the active sites changes from Cu(I) towards Cu(II) due to CO2 and H2O co-adsorption and changes back to Cu(I) after CO2 conversion under visible light illumination. The Cu2O photocatalyst oxidizes water as it reduces CO2. Concomitantly, the crystal lattice expands due to CO2 adsorption then reverts after CO2 conversion. The internal quantum yield for unassisted wireless photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to methanol using Cu2O crystals is similar to 72%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available