4.7 Article

Influence of new hydrophobic agent on the mechanical properties of modified cemented paste backfill

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 5716-5727

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.039

Keywords

Cemented paste backfill (CPB); Cement paste; Hydrophobic agent; Dewatering; Rheological property; Properties of hardened CPB

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774022]
  2. State Key Research Development Program of China [2017YFC0804101]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201706460058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cement-based materials is indispensable in the construction process, and the characteristics of cement mortar affect the quality and efficiency of construction obviously. Roof-contacted filling and dehydration in stope are two critical problems in mines in the process of mine filling, which has a very important influence on the strength of filling body. In order to enhance the work performance of cement paste backfill (CPB) and improve the work efficiency in field engineering, the mixed hydrophobic agent was mixed in the CPB slurry to improve the dewatering efficiency. The dewatering test device was designed by authors to test the dewatering efficiency of the CPB mixing different dosage of the hydrophobic agent. The rheological properties of the cement paste mixing with the hydrophobic agent were tested by the rheometer R/S plus to achieve the workability of the CPB. To analyze the influence mechanism of the hydrophobic agent on the dewatering efficiency of CPB, the density, shrinkage, water vapour permeability and capillary water absorption of the CPB specimens were measured. Considering the effect of the hydrophobic agent on the compressive strength of the hardened CPB, it can be concluded that the reasonable addition dosage of hydrophobic agent in CPB is 1% by weight. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available