4.6 Article

Quantifying the Drivers of the Clear Sky Greenhouse Effect, 2000-2016

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 124, Issue 21, Pages 11354-11371

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031017

Keywords

greenhouse effect; super greenhouse effect; water vapor; climate feedback; relative humidity; middle troposphere

Funding

  1. Cooperative Institute for Climate Science [NA140AR4320106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clear sky greenhouse effect (G) is defined as the trapping of infrared radiation by the atmosphere in the absence of clouds. The magnitude and variability of G is an important element in the understanding of Earth's energy balance; yet the quantification of the governing factors of G is poor. The global mean G averaged over 2000 to 2016 is 130-133 W m(-2) across data sets. We use satellite observations from Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System Energy Balance and Filled (CERES EBAF) to calculate the monthly anomalies in the clear sky greenhouse effect (Delta G). We quantify the contributions to Delta G due to changes in surface temperature, atmospheric temperature, and water vapor by performing partial radiation perturbation experiments using ERA-Interim and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory's Atmospheric Model 4.0 climatological data. Water vapor in the middle troposphere and upper troposphere is found to contribute equally to the global mean and tropical mean Delta G. Holding relative humidity (RH) fixed in the radiative transfer calculations captures the temporal variability of global mean Delta G while variations in RH control the regional Delta G signal. The variations in RH are found to help generate the clear sky super greenhouse effect (SGE). Thirty-six percent of Earth's area exhibits SGE, and this disproportionately contributes to 70% of the globally averaged magnitude of Delta G. In the global mean, G's sensitivity to surface temperature is 3.1-4.0 W m(-2) K-1, and the clear sky longwave feedback parameter is 1.5-2.0 W m(-2) K-1. Observations from CERES EBAF lie at the more sensitive ends of these ranges and the spread arises from its cloud removal treatment, suggesting that it is difficult to constrain clear sky feedbacks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available