4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical studies on the compressive mechanical properties of the metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108036

Keywords

Auxetic honeycomb; Compressive behavior; Deformation mode; Crushing stress

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11802030, 11802031]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2018 M641207, 2018 M641208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, not only the effect of cell-wall thickness on the deformation mode of metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb was firstly studied, but also the negative Poisson's ratio (NPR) effect on the crushing stress was also clarified by the quasi-static compressive experiments. Firstly, two types of typical reentrant hexagonal honeycombs with thin-walled and thick-walled cells were manufactured and compressive tests were carried out to characterize the deformation modes, negative Poisson's ratio distribution and crushing stress. Experiment results showed that the deformation mode of thin-walled honeycomb was quite different from that of thick-walled honeycomb, which has not been found in the existing reported papers. Secondly, a finite element (FE) model of the reentrant honeycomb was established and the FE results were systematically compared with the experimental results. The effects of honeycomb cell's number on the compressive deformation and the crushing stress of the honeycomb were studied. The results showed that once the honeycomb contained more than four cells in both transverse and horizontal directions, both the compressive deformation and the crushing stress were close to the experimental results. Finally, the energy absorption characteristics of reentrant honeycomb during compression were discussed. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available