4.5 Article

Fabrication and optimization of hybrid AA-6082-T6 alloy/8%Al2O3(Alumina)/2%Grp metal matrix composites using novel Box-Behnken methodology processed by wire-sinking electric discharge machining

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab4b97

Keywords

Box-Behnken method; MMC (material matrix composite); MRR (Material removal rate); SR (surface roughness); EDM (electric discharge machine); SEM (scanning electron microscope); EDAX (energy dispersive analysis of x-ray)

Funding

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India [YSS/2015/001294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reports the fabrication and studies the influence of Electric discharge machining parameters during machining of the hybrid AA-6082-T6 alloy/8%Al2O3(Alumina)/2%Graphite (Gr(p)) alloy-based metal matrix composite. Experiments were designed & optimized via Novel Box-Behnken technique in Response surface methodology. The pulse off-time, pulse on-time, peak current, and applied voltage used during this research investigation considered as process parameters. These process parameters measured in terms of MRR (Material removal rate) and SR (Surface roughness) using a copper rod of empty set 12 mm as an electrode. A scientific model was additionally created to achieve a better performance in optimizing process parameters. From the experimental study, it has concluded that both MRR and SR are directly and mostly influenced using Pulse-on time & peak current. The affected response parameters were also evident by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) & Energy Dispersive Analysis of X-Ray (EDAX) observations. This experimental research study believed that our Novel approach to Design & Optimization plays a vital role for researchers who tend to work in the field of process parameters optimization during machining.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available