4.6 Article

Thermal-mechanical coupling simulation and experimental research on the grinding of zirconia ceramics

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 41-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.024

Keywords

Zirconia ceramic; Subsurface damage; Thermal-mechanical coupling; Grinding; Finite element simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51405152]
  2. Hunan Provincial Local Cooperative Project of China Scholarship Council [201808430275]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2017JJ2092]
  4. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate of China [CX2018B669]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A thermal-mechanical (TM) coupling simulation model of zirconia (ZrO2) grinding was created based on the finite element method to simulate the subsurface damage (SSD), the workpiece stress and the grinding temperature. A series of orthogonal experiments were accomplished by using an MGK7120 x 6/F NC surface grinder. The results show good agreement between the experiment and simulation. With the rotation of the grinding wheel, the abrasive grains gradually cut into the workpiece, and the workpiece stress increases with the contact time between the abrasive grains and the workpiece. When the abrasive grain just completely cuts into the workpiece, the grinding temperature reaches its maximum. The proposed simulation model for TM coupling exhibits a higher accuracy than that of the pure mechanics simulation model, with an absolute deviation of less than 6% for the simulation of SSD depth. During the grinding process, the effect of the grinding depth (a(p)) on the SSD depth is the greatest, followed by the effect of wheel speed (v(s)), and that of workpiece speed (v(w)) is the least. Additionally, v(s) is negatively correlated with the SSD depth, while v(w) and a(p) are positively correlated with the SSD depth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available