4.6 Article

The role of nature-based solutions in disaster risk reduction: The decision maker's perspectives on urban resilience in Sao Paulo state

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101219

Keywords

Disasters; Ecosystem services; Green infrastructure; Landscape; Urban resilience

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil [17/24467-6]
  2. National Institute of Science and Technology for Climate Change Phase 2 under National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil [465501/2014-1]
  3. FAPESP, Brazil [2014/50848-9, 2015/50122-0, 15/24099-1]
  4. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) [16/2014]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaf, Germany [DFG-IRTG 1740/2]
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [17/24467-6] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the co-learning process outcomes based on Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) and Nature-based Solutions (NbS) for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). EbA principles are directly associated with resilience improvement that depends on NbS for change of patterns and actions. Basically, we expected to explore how urban systems can be improved avoiding environmental degradation (i.e. waste ecosystem services and their benefits). Therefore, distinct scenarios were proposed with specific objectives: (1) identification of barriers and challenges; (2) identification of opportunities for NbS implementation. Throughout a workshop, we had chance to discuss knowledge gaps and potential emerging research such as: (1) synergies between DRR and EbA; (2) a long-term perspective of ecosystem management; (3) dynamic of DRR and the natural processes involved considering the complexity of NbS. We conclude that existing measures are limited in their ecological focus regarding to DRR and benefits they address. For this reason, a more comprehensive approach to support NbS and its systematic mainstreaming is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available