4.7 Article

Changes in ecosystem services from wetland loss and restoration: An ecosystem assessment of the Danube Delta (1960-2010)

Journal

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100965

Keywords

Ecosystem assessment; Socio-environmental costs; Wetlands; Restoration; Danube Delta; Romania

Funding

  1. European Economic Area grant EEA
  2. OpenNESS project (European Community) [308428]
  3. Norwegian University of Life Sciences ( NMBU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deltaic flood plains provide critically important ecosystem services, including food production, fresh water, flood control, nutrient cycling, spiritual values and opportunities for recreation. Despite growing recognition of their societal and ecological importance, deltaic flood plains are declining worldwide at alarming rates. Loss of wetland ecosystem services bears socio-environmental costs overlooked in land-use planning. Conversely, wetland restoration can deliver important long-term benefits. This paper examines effects of different land use policies on ecosystem services provided by the Danube Delta, one of Europe's largest and most outstanding wetlands. First, we identify, characterize and measure the most important ecosystem services provided by the Danube Delta. Second, we assess trends between 1960 and 2010, contrasting periods of economic development (1960-1989) and ecological restoration (1990-2010). Our results indicate that i) the Danube Delta provides important services with benefits accrue from local communities to humanity at large, ii) that two thirds of the Delta's ecosystem services have declined over the studied period and iii) that ongoing restoration efforts have so far been unable to reverse trends in ecosystem service decline. Benefits from ecological restoration policies are already becoming apparent, but at a scale not yet comparable to the costs from ecosystem decline incurred over previous decades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available