4.6 Article

Reuse of Waste Material Waste Sludge Water from a Concrete Plant in Cement Composites: A Case Study

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app9214519

Keywords

replacement; mixing water; waste sludge water; concrete plant; cement; composites

Funding

  1. VSB-TUO, Faculty of Mining and Geology [SP2018/12, SP2019/29]
  2. Moravian-Silesian Region [RRC/10/2018]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports-National Sustainability Program I [LO1406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results of research dealing with the use of recycled waste sludge water from a concrete plant (CP) as partial or complete replacement of mixing water in cement mixtures. The need to recycle waste sludge water generated as a by-product (waste sludge water) during the production of fresh concrete in the concrete plant results from the environmental and economic problems associated with the operation of the concrete plant. Mixing water was replaced with recycled waste sludge water in the amount of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%. In order to determine the effect of partial or complete replacement of mixing water with waste sludge water from the concrete plant in the production of cement composites, laboratory tests of waste sludge water were carried out to determine whether the waste sludge water complies with the requirements for mixing water defined in CSN EN 1008. The tests also determined the properties of fresh cement mortar and hardened cement composites. These were tests of the beginning and end of cement mortar setting, and the strength characteristics (flexural strength, compressive strength). The results of these tests show that it is possible to replace the mixing water by waste sludge water from the concrete plant in the amount of up to 25% without significantly affecting the tested properties, in comparison with the formula containing pure mixing water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available