4.8 Article

Negative CT Contrast Agents for the Diagnosis of Malignant Osteosarcoma

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201901214

Keywords

H-2 release; HMSN@AB@PEG; negative CT contrast agents; osteosarcoma; tumor acidic microenvironment

Funding

  1. National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51725202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872094]
  3. National Science Foundation for the Young Scientists of China [51702211]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0107900]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Equipment for Biological Diagnosis and Therapy in Universities of Shandong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current positive computed tomography (CT) contrast agents (PCTCAs) including clinical iodides, present high CT density value (CT-DV). However, they are incapable for the accurate diagnosis of some diseases with high CT-DV, such as osteosarcoma. Because bones and PCTCAs around osteosarcoma generate similar X-ray attenuations. Here, an innovative strategy of negative CT contrast agents (NCTCAs) to reduce the CT-DV of osteosarcoma is proposed, contributing to accurate detection of osteosarcoma. Hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles, loading ammonia borane molecules and further modified by polyethylene glycol, are synthesized as NCTCAs for the diagnosis of osteosarcoma. The nanocomposites can produce H-2 in situ at osteosarcoma areas by responding to the acidic microenvironment of osteosarcoma, resulting in nearly 20 times reduction of CT density in osteosarcoma. This helps form large CT density contrast between bones and osteosarcoma, and successfully achieves accurate diagnosis of osteosarcoma. Meanwhile, The NCTCAs strategy greatly expands the scope of CT application, and provides profound implications for the precise clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available