4.1 Article

Second-line rituximab-bendamustine versus rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the real world

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 13, Pages 1067-1075

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0062

Keywords

bendamustine; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; gemcitabine; oxaliplatin; real-world study; rituximab

Funding

  1. F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Despite long-term responses to first-line immunochemotherapy, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have relapsed/refractory disease. Second-line treatment options are available. However, a large proportion of patients are ineligible for transplantation/intensive therapy. Patients & methods: This observational study of 702 patients in the USA, who used second-line therapies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL, evaluated treatment patterns and overall survival (OS). The study focused on the OS outcome of patients receiving second-line rituximab-bendamustine or rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. Results & conclusion: Rituximab-bendamustine and rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin were received by 4.6 and 1.4% of patients, respectively (N = 42/702). Median and 1-year OS rates were similar between regimens. Many of the 200 different treatment regimens observed in second line were modified versions of National Comprehensive Cancer Network regimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available