4.3 Article

Serum Levels of Coll2-1, a Specific Biomarker of Cartilage Degradation, Are Not Affected by Sampling Conditions, Circadian Rhythm, and Seasonality

Journal

CARTILAGE
Volume 13, Issue 1_SUPPL, Pages 540S-549S

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1947603519878489

Keywords

osteoarthritis; biomarkers; cartilage; knee; clinical study

Categories

Funding

  1. Walloon region [NCT02070224, 6905]
  2. ARTIALIS SA [NCT02070224, 6905]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The serum Coll2-1 biomarker value showed minimal variation under different sampling conditions, but significantly elevated in patients with osteoarthritis, indicating its association with cartilage degradation.
Objective: To assess intraindividual biological variability of serum cartilage specific biomarker Coll2-1 and define the best standardized conditions for blood sampling. Design: Blood samples were taken from 116 subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) at a single time point (PRODIGE study) and from 15 healthy subjects under various conditions, including fasting condition, sampling time and season, blood treatment, and type of blood collection tube (COVAR study). Type II collagen-specific biomarker Coll2-1 was directly measured in serum using an immunoassay. Results: There was no significant difference on Coll2-1 values between samples collected at any of the 5 sampling times or at any of the sampling days measured. None of the sampling parameters tested had a significant impact on Coll2-1 value (clotting time, clotting temperature and temperature of blood centrifugation, type of tube). On the contrary, differences were found in between subjects and between subjects with knee OA and healthy subjects. Conclusion: Coll2-1 measurement is not affected by sampling specific conditions, circadian rhythm or seasons but was found elevated in subject with knee OA indicating that Coll2-1 serum variation is not linked to the study environment, but to cartilage degradation in OA. Coll2-1 assay is sufficiently robust for use in OA clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available