4.7 Article

Clarifying immunoglobulin gene usage in systemic and localized immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis by mass spectrometry

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages 299-306

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-743997

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thegoal of this studywasto investigate the frequency of use of light-chain variable region (IGVL) genes among patients with systemic (ALS) and localized (ALL) amyloidosis and to assess for associations between IGVL gene usage and organ tropism. Weevaluated clinic charts from 821 AL patients seen at the Mayo Clinic who had bone marrow, fat pad, and solid organ tissue samples typed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). We identified 701 patients with ALS and 120 with ALL. Overall, we were able to identify an IGVL gene in 87 (72%) patients with ALL and 573 (82%) patients with ALS. When compared with ALL, LV6-57 was more common, whereas KV3-20 and heavy-chain codeposition were less common in ALS. In this large series of ALS, characteristics particular to specific genotypes became apparent. LV6-57 patients were more likely to have renal involvement and to harbor a translocation 11;14. LV3-01 patients were less likely to haveadvancedcardiac diseaseandrenal involvement. LV2-14 patientsweremore likely to have peripheral nerve involvement, an intact circulating immunoglobulin, and lower circulating dFLC. LV1-44 patients were more likely to have cardiac involvement. KV1-33 patients had more liver involvement and higher circulating dFLC. Finally, KV1-05 was associated with inferior overall survival but not independently of cardiac stage. IGVL gene usage appears to provide clues about disease pathophysiology and tissue tropism. LC-MS is a high-throughput and low-resource technique that can be used to identify IGVL gene from clinical tissue specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available