4.4 Article

Transverse momentum dependent distributions in e+e- and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering using jets

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2019)031

Keywords

Deep Inelastic Scattering (Phenomenology); Jets

Funding

  1. Spanish MECD grant [FPA2016-75654-C2-2-P]
  2. Universidad Complutense de Madrid [CT17/17-CT18/17]
  3. ERC [ERC-STG-2015-677323]
  4. D-ITP consortium, a program of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) - Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW)
  5. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA16201 PARTICLEFACE]
  6. European Union [824093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extraction of transverse momentum dependent distributions (TMDs) in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering (SIDIS) is complicated by the presence of both initial- and final-state nonperturbative physics. We recently proposed measuring jets (in- stead of hadrons) as a solution, showing that for the Winner-Take-All jet axis the same factorization formulae valid for hadrons applied to jets of arbitrary size. This amounts to simply replacing TMD fragmentation functions by our TMD jet functions. In this paper we present the calculation of these jet functions at one loop. We obtain phenomenological results for e(+)e(-)-> dijet (Belle II, LEP) and SIDIS (HERA, EIC) with a jet, building on the arTeMiDe code. Surprisingly, we find that the limit of large jet radius describes the full R results extremely well, and we extract the two-loop jet function in this limit using Event2, allowing us to achieve (NLL)-L-3 accuracy. We demonstrate the perturbative convergence of our predictions and explore the kinematic dependence of the cross section. Finally, we investigate the sensitivity to nonperturbative physics, demonstrating that jets are a promising probe of proton structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available