4.6 Article

Barium-Promoted Ruthenium Catalysts on Yittria-Stabilized Zirconia Supports for Ammonia Synthesis

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 21, Pages 18038-18047

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04929

Keywords

Ammonia synthesis; Heterogeneous catalysis; Ru/YSZ; Microkinetics

Funding

  1. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AR0001004, DE-AR0000808]
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET-1512172]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cost-effective, small-scale, distributed synthesis of ammonia depends on effective catalysts and processes that operate under modest elevated pressure (i.e., p < 20 bar) conditions. The present paper considers Ru as the active catalyst supported on yittria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). The addition of alkali and alkaline-earth metal promoters is found to increase synthesis rates by an order of magnitude. The rate enhancement is largely insensitive to the promoter concentration, with Cs outperforming Ba and K by a factor of 2. However, Ba is found to be stable whereas Cs degrades more rapidly, which is attributed to the low melting point of its oxide. At 400 degrees C and 1.0 MPa, the specific synthesis rate over Ba-Ru is measured to be approximately 1410 mmol g(Ru)(-1) h(-1), higher than the most active oxide-supported Ru catalysts reported in the literature. The rate becomes inhibited by H-2 absorption at low temperature (below 350 degrees C), but lower H-2/N-2 ratios enable the rate to remain comparable to what is observed in stoichiometric mixtures at temperatures below 400 degrees C. The paper reports a new detailed microkinetic model that accurately captures the observed behavior, revealing that adsorption is coverage dependent. These results provide insight and direction into developing alternatives to Haber-Bosch for distributed synthesis of green ammonia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available