4.6 Article

Inconsistent Relationships of Primary Consumer N Stable Isotope Values to Gradients of Sheep/Beef Farming Intensity and Flow Reduction in Streams

Journal

WATER
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w11112239

Keywords

agricultural land use; antagonism; Deleatidium; grazer-scrapers

Funding

  1. NZ Ministry of Business, Innovation Employment [C01 x 1005]
  2. University of Otago Postgraduate Scholarship
  3. University of Otago Department of Zoology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotope values of primary consumers have been proposed as indicators of human impacts on nitrogen dynamics. Until now, these values have been related only to single-stressor gradients of land-use intensity in stream ecology, whereas potential interactive effects of multiple stressors are unknown. It also remains unknown whether stable isotope values of different primary consumers show similar relationships along gradients of stressor intensities. We sampled three common invertebrate grazers along gradients of sheep/beef farming intensity (0-95% intensively managed exotic pasture) and flow reduction (0-92% streamflow abstracted for irrigation). The delta N-15 values of the three primary consumers differed substantially along stressor gradients. Deleatidium delta N-15 values were positively related to farming intensity, showing a saturation curve, whereas Physella snail delta N-15 values were negatively related to farming intensity and Potamopyrgus snail delta N-15 values showed no relationship. In addition, Deleatidium stable isotope values responded positively to flow reduction intensity, a previously unstudied variable. An antagonistic multiple-stressor interaction was detected only for the mayfly Deleatidium, which occurred in streams experiencing up to 53% farming intensity. The lack of consistency in the relationships of the most important primary consumer grazers along the studied gradients may reduce their suitability as an indicator of anthropogenic N inputs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available