4.7 Review

Linkage between the mechanisms of thrombocytopenia and thrombopoiesis

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 127, Issue 10, Pages 1234-1241

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-607903

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Project of Realization of Regenerative Medicine and Highway from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  3. Initiative for Accelerating Regulatory Science in Innovative Drug, Medical Device, and Regenerative Medicine from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H03005] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thrombocytopenia is defined as a status in which platelet numbers are reduced. Imbalance between the homeostatic regulation of platelet generation and destruction is 1 potential cause of thrombocytopenia. In adults, platelet generation is a 2-stage process entailing the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells into mature megakaryocytes (MKs; known as megakaryopoiesis) and release of platelets from MKs (known as thrombopoiesis or platelet biogenesis). Until recently, information about the genetic defects responsible for congenital thrombocytopenia was only available for a few forms of the disease. However, investigations over the past 15 years have identified mutations in genes encoding >20 different proteins that are responsible for these disorders, which has advanced our understanding of megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis. The underlying pathogenic mechanisms can be categorized as (1) defects in MK lineage commitment and differentiation, (2) defects in MK maturation, and (3) defect in platelet release. Using these developmental stage categories, we here update recently described mechanisms underlying megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis and discuss the association between platelet generation systems and thrombocytopenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available