4.6 Article

CD47 Blocking Antibody Accelerates Hematoma Clearance After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Aged Rats

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 541-551

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-019-00745-4

Keywords

CD47 blocking antibody; Cerebral hemorrhage; Macrophage activation; Aged rats

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS090925, NS-096917, NS-106746, NS-112394]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both experimental studies and surgical clinical trials suggest that hematoma clearance is a therapeutic target in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We have investigated effects of CD47, a don't eat me signal expressed on erythrocytes, on hematoma resolution after ICH in young mice. This study expands those findings by examining the effects on a CD47 blocking antibody in aged rats. First, male Fischer 344 rats (18 months old) received an intracaudate injection of 50 mu L autologous whole blood or saline. Hematoma features of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurological deficits were evaluated within 3 days. Second, rats had an intracaudate co-injection of 50 mu L autologous blood with either CD47 blocking antibody or IgG. MRI was used to quantify hematoma/iron volume, hemolysis, brain swelling, and atrophy at different time points, behavioral tests to assess neurological deficits, and immunohistochemistry to assess brain injury and neuroinflammation. The CD47 blocking antibody significantly promoted hematoma clearance, attenuated brain swelling, hemolysis, and neuronal loss and increased the number of phagocytic macrophages in and around hematoma 3 days after ICH. Moreover, CD47 blockade reduced neuronal loss, brain atrophy, and neurobehavioral deficits at day 28. These results indicate that a CD47 blocking antibody can accelerate hematoma clearance and alleviate short- and long-term brain injury after ICH in aged rats and that it might be a therapeutic strategy for ICH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available