4.7 Article

Combining Machine Learning and Compact Polarimetry for Estimating Soil Moisture from C-Band SAR Data

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs11202451

Keywords

RADARSAT-2; agricultural areas; soil moisture retrieval; machine learning algorithms; compact polarimetry

Funding

  1. Italian Space Agency (ASI) [ASI-SOAR-PI2880/5225]
  2. Canadian Space Agency (CSA) [ASI-SOAR-PI2880/5225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aimed at exploiting the joint use of machine learning and polarimetry for improving the retrieval of surface soil moisture content (SMC) from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) acquisitions at C-band. The study was conducted on two agricultural areas in Canada, for which a series of RADARSAT-2 (RS2) images were available along with direct measurements of SMC from in situ stations. The analysis confirmed the sensitivity of RS2 backscattering (sigma degrees) to SMC. The comparison of SMC with the compact polarimetry (CP) parameters, computed from the RS2 acquisitions by the CP data simulator, pointed out that some CP parameters had a sensitivity to SMC equal or better than sigma degrees, with correlation coefficients up to R similar or equal to 0.4. Based on these results, the potential of machine learning (ML) for SMC retrieval was exploited by implementing and testing on the available data an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm. The algorithm was implemented using several combinations of sigma degrees and CP parameters. Validation results of the algorithm with in situ observations confirmed the promising capabilities of the ML techniques for SMC monitoring. Furthermore, results pointed out the potential of CP in improving the SMC retrieval accuracy, especially when used in combination with linearly polarized sigma degrees. Depending on the considered input combination, the ANN algorithm was able to estimate SMC with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) between 3% and 7% of SMC and R between 0.7 and 0.9.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available