4.7 Article

DE-Net: Deep Encoding Network for Building Extraction from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs11202380

Keywords

building extraction; deep learning; fully convolutional network; high-resolution remote sensing imagery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41631179]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFB0503600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep convolutional neural networks have promoted significant progress in building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing imagery. Although most of such work focuses on modifying existing image segmentation networks in computer vision, we propose a new network in this paper, Deep Encoding Network (DE-Net), that is designed for the very problem based on many lately introduced techniques in image segmentation. Four modules are used to construct DE-Net: the inception-style downsampling modules combining a striding convolution layer and a max-pooling layer, the encoding modules comprising six linear residual blocks with a scaled exponential linear unit (SELU) activation function, the compressing modules reducing the feature channels, and a densely upsampling module that enables the network to encode spatial information inside feature maps. Thus, DE-Net achieves state-of-the-art performance on the WHU Building Dataset in recall, F1-Score, and intersection over union (IoU) metrics without pre-training. It also outperformed several segmentation networks in our self-built Suzhou Satellite Building Dataset. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of DE-Net on building extraction from aerial imagery and satellite imagery. It also suggests that given enough training data, designing and training a network from scratch may excel fine-tuning models pre-trained on datasets unrelated to building extraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available