Journal
PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages -Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002928
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Postgraduate Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Scholarship (NHMRC)
- RACP NHMRC Kincaid-Smith Scholarship
- Australian NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [1104975]
- NHMRC [1135820, 1138860]
- Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN)
- OPRA - Bill AMP
- Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1164105, OPP1054404]
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Exxon Mobil Foundation
- Australian Centre for Research Excellence on Malaria Elimination (ACREME) - National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1134989]
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1138860, 1104975, 1135820] Funding Source: NHMRC
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Author summaryWhy was this study done? The susceptibility of to chloroquine is decreasing in many malaria-endemic locations. Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are recommended in areas of emerging chloroquine resistance; however, the optimal ACT is not clear. Knowledge of the comparative advantages and disadvantages of different ACTs will help guide national policy makers. What did the researchers do and find? Following a systematic review, individual data from 2,017 patients were pooled from 19 studies undertaken between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2018. Cox regression analysis showed that the risk of recurrence at day 42 was 12-fold greater following treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) alone compared with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP), although by day 63 the risk of recurrence following DP was also high. For every 5-mg/kg increase in the dose of piperaquine, the risk of recurrence at day 42 fell by 37%. A delay in the time to symptomatic recurrence was associated with an increase in haemoglobin. Coadministration with primaquine reduced the risk of recurrence at day 42 after AL by 80% and at day 63 after DP by 92%. What do these findings mean? There is a high risk of recurrence following AL or DP unless they are combined with primaquine. Compared with AL, patients treated with DP have a reduced risk of early . recurrence. Delaying the time to recurrence was associated with greater haematological recovery, and this has potential to prevent morbidity related to multiple rapid recurrences by preventing a cumulative risk of anaemia. Background Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended for uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria in areas of emerging chloroquine resistance. We undertook a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) with or without primaquine (PQ) on the risk of recurrent P. vivax. Methods and findings Clinical efficacy studies of uncomplicated P. vivax treated with DP or AL and published between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2018, were identified by conducting a systematic review registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42016053310. Investigators of eligible studies were invited to contribute individual patient data that were pooled using standardised methodology. The effect of mg/kg dose of piperaquine/lumefantrine, ACT administered, and PQ on the rate of P. vivax recurrence between days 7 and 42 after starting treatment were investigated by Cox regression analyses according to an a priori analysis plan. Secondary outcomes were the risk of recurrence assessed on days 28 and 63. Nineteen studies enrolling 2,017 patients were included in the analysis. The risk of recurrent P. vivax at day 42 was significantly higher in the 384 patients treated with AL alone (44.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.7-49.8) compared with the 812 patients treated with DP alone (9.3%, 95% CI 7.1-12.2): adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 12.63 (95% CI 6.40-24.92), p < 0.001. The rates of recurrence assessed at days 42 and 63 were associated inversely with the dose of piperaquine: AHRs (95% CI) for every 5-mg/kg increase 0.63 (0.48-0.84), p = 0.0013 and 0.83 (0.73-0.94), p = 0.0033, respectively. The dose of lumefantrine was not significantly associated with the rate of recurrence (1.07 for every 5-mg/kg increase, 95% CI 0.99-1.16, p = 0.0869). In a post hoc analysis, in patients with symptomatic recurrence after AL, the mean haemoglobin increased 0.13 g/dL (95% CI 0.01-0.26) for every 5 days that recurrence was delayed, p = 0.0407. Coadministration of PQ reduced substantially the rate of recurrence assessed at day 42 after AL (AHR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.41, p < 0.001) and at day 63 after DP (AHR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.70, p = 0.0233). Results were limited by follow-up of patients to 63 days or less and nonrandomised treatment groups. Conclusions In this study, we observed the risk of P. vivax recurrence at day 42 to be significantly lower following treatment with DP compared with AL, reflecting the longer period of post-treatment prophylaxis; this risk was reduced substantially by coadministration with PQ. We found that delaying P. vivax recurrence was associated with a small but significant improvement in haemoglobin. These results highlight the benefits of PQ radical cure and also the provision of blood-stage antimalarial agents with prolonged post-treatment prophylaxis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available