Journal
PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages -Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000389
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/131640/2017]
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness/FEDER funds [FFI2016-78034-C2-1-P]
- Generalitat de Catalunya [2017-SGR-341]
- MEXT/JSPS [4903, JP17H06379]
- European Union [PIRG-GA-2009-256413]
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/131640/2017] Funding Source: FCT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recently, prominent theoretical linguists have argued for an explicit scenario for the evolution of the human language capacity on the basis of its computational properties. Concretely, the simplicity of a minimalist formulation of the operation Merge, which allows humans to recursively compute hierarchical relations in language, has been used to promote a sudden-emergence, single-mutation scenario. In support of this view, Merge is said to be either fully present or fully absent: one cannot have half-Merge. On this basis, it is inferred that the emergence of our fully fledged language capacity had to be sudden. Thus, proponents of this view draw a parallelism between the formal complexity of the operation at the computational level and the number of evolutionary steps it must imply. Here, we examine this argument in detail and show that the jump from the atomicity of Merge to a single-mutation scenario is not valid and therefore cannot be used as justification for a theory of language evolution along those lines.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available