4.7 Article

Fetal and adult progenitors give rise to unique populations of CD8+ T cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 128, Issue 26, Pages 3073-3082

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-06-725366

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. New York State Department of Health
  2. National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director grant [1S10OD010693-01]
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [R01AI105265, R01AI110613]
  4. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P50HD076210, R01GM105668]
  5. Cornell Center for Vertebrate Genomics
  6. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [2011078441]
  7. Empire State Stem Cell Fund
  8. [C026718]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the ontogeny of the mammalian immune system, distinct lineages of cells arise from fetal and adult hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) during specific stages of development. However, in some cases, the same immune cell type is produced by both HSC populations, resulting in the generation of phenotypically similar cells with distinct origins and divergent functional properties. In this report, we demonstrate that neonatal CD8(+) T cells preferentially become short-lived effectors and adult CD8(+) T cells selectively form long-lived memory cells after infection because they are derived from distinct progenitor cells. Notably, we find that naive neonatal CD8(+) T cells originate from a progenitor cell that is distinguished by expression of Lin28b. Remarkably, ectopic expression of Lin28b enables adult progenitors to give rise to CD8(+) T cells that are phenotypically and functionally analogous to those found in neonates. These findings suggest that neonatal and adult CD8(+) T cells belong to separate lineages of CD8(+) T cells, and potentially explain why it is challenging to elicit memory CD8(+) T cells in early life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available