4.3 Article

Impact of Wildfire Smoke on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Colorado, 2007-2015

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193720

Keywords

wildfire smoke; PM2.5; Colorado; pre-term birth; birth weight; gestational diabetes; gestational hypertension; small for gestational age; assisted ventilation; NICU admission

Funding

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency [83588401]
  2. US National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program [NNX15AG35G]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorado is regularly impacted by long-range transport of wildfire smoke from upwind regions. This smoke is a major source of ambient PM2.5. Maternal exposure to total PM2.5 during pregnancy has been linked to decreased birth weight and other adverse outcomes, although the impact of wildfire smoke contribution has only recently been investigated. The objective of this study was to estimate associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and ambient wildfire smoke PM2.5. Wildfire smoke PM2.5 exposures were estimated using a previously published method incorporating ground-based monitors and remote sensing data. Logistic regression models stratified by ZIP code and mixed models with random intercept by ZIP code were used to test for associations. The primary outcomes of interest were preterm birth and birth weight. Secondary outcomes included gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, neonatal intensive care unit admission, assisted ventilation, small for gestational age, and low birth weight. Exposure to wildfire smoke PM2.5 over the full gestation and during the second trimester were positively associated with pre-term birth (OR = 1.076 (mu g/m(3))(-1) [95% CI = 1.016, 1.139; p = 0.013] and 1.132 (mu g/m(3))(-1) [95% CI = 1.088, 1.178]; p < 0.0001, respectively), while exposure during the first trimester was associated with decreased birth weight (-5.7 g/(mu g/m(3)) [95% CI: -11.1, -0.4; p = 0.036]). Secondary outcomes were mixed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available