4.6 Review

The benefits of exercise in cancer patients and the criteria for exercise prescription in cardio-oncology

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 725-735

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1177/2047487319874900

Keywords

Exercise; oncology; training; prevention; cardiotoxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review focuses on investigating the origin, prevention, and reversal strategies of cardiac damage, and explores the beneficial effects of physical exercise on cancer patients. It suggests personalized exercise prescriptions and emphasizes the importance of cardiac evaluation in prescribing exercise for these patients.
Cancer and cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of death in high-income countries. Cardiovascular complications can be found in cancer patients, being the result of so-called 'cardio-toxicity'. Therefore, it becomes essential to thoroughly investigate the origin of cardiac damage and the strategy to prevent it or to reverse the negative remodelling associated with cardiotoxicity. In this review the beneficial effects of physical exercise in cancer patients were analysed, particularly to prevent cardio-toxicity before its clinical manifestation. According to the relevance of exercise, we suggest strategies for exercise prescription with a tailored approach in these patients. In conclusion, physical exercise seems to be a promising and effective treatment for cancer patients during and after therapy and seems to counteract the negative effects induced by drugs on the cardiovascular system. Exercise prescription should be tailored according to patient's individual characteristics, to the drugs administered, to the personal history, and to his/her response to exercise, taking into account that different types of training can be prescribed according also to the patient's choice. A cardiological evaluation including exercise testing is essential for an appropriate prescription of exercise in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available