4.8 Article

Intra-lineage Plasticity and Functional Reprogramming Maintain Natural Killer Cell Repertoire Diversity

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 2284-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.058

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Children's Cancer Society
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Tobias Foundation
  5. Karolinska Institutet
  6. Norwegian Cancer Society
  7. Norwegian Research Council
  8. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  9. KG Jebsen Center for Cancer Immunotherapy
  10. Mildred Scheel postdoctoral scholarship from the Dr. Mildred Scheel Foundation for Cancer Research of the German Cancer Aid Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural killer (NK) cell repertoires are made up of phenotypically distinct subsets with different functional properties. The molecular programs involved in maintaining NK cell repertoire diversity under homeostatic conditions remain elusive. Here, we show that subset-specific NK cell proliferation kinetics correlate with mTOR activation, and global repertoire diversity is maintained through a high degree of intra-lineage subset plasticity during interleukin (IL)-15-driven homeostatic proliferation in vitro. Slowly cycling sorted KIR(+)CD56(dim) NK cells with an induced CD57 phenotype display increased functional potential associated with increased transcription of genes involved in adhesion and immune synapse formation. Rapidly cycling cells upregulate NKG2A, display a general loss of functionality, and a transcriptional signature associated with increased apoptosis/cellular stress, actin-remodeling, and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation. These results shed light on the role of intra-lineage plasticity during NK cell homeostasis and suggest that the functional fate of the cell is tightly linked to the acquired phenotype and transcriptional reprogramming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available