4.5 Article

A Method to Quantify FRET Stoichiometry with Phasor Plot Analysis and Acceptor Lifetime Ingrowth

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages 999-1002

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.012

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Alzheimer Research UK Trust
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  5. China Scholarship Council-Cambridge Scholarship
  6. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-EG2012A-1, ARUK-ESG2012-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K013629/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H046593/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. BBSRC [BB/K013629/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. EPSRC [EP/H046593/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FRET is widely used for the study of protein-protein interactions in biological samples. However, it is difficult to quantify both the FRET efficiency (E) and the affinity (K-d) of the molecular interaction from intermolecular FRET signals in samples of unknown stoichiometry. Here, we present a method for the simultaneous quantification of the complete set of interaction parameters, including fractions of bound donors and acceptors, local protein concentrations, and dissociation constants, in each image pixel. The method makes use of fluorescence lifetime information from both donor and acceptor molecules and takes advantage of the linear properties of the phasor plot approach. We demonstrate the capability of our method in vitro in a microfluidic device and also in cells, via the determination of the binding affinity between tagged versions of glutathione and glutathione S-transferase, and via the determination of competitor concentration. The potential of the method is explored with simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available