4.5 Review

Treatment outcomes of tuberculous meningitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-0966-8

Keywords

Tuberculous meningitis; Outcomes; Adults; HIV

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870015, 81370121]
  2. National Scientific and Technological Major Project of China [2018ZX10715003, 2014SZ0220]
  3. Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Tuberculous meningitis is the most devastating presentation of disease with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We sought to evaluate treatment outcomes for adult patients with this disease. Methods The Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all relevant studies. We pooled appropriate data to estimate treatment outcomes at the end of treatment and follow-up. Results Among the articles identified, 22 met our inclusion criteria, with 2437 patients. In a pooled analysis, the risk of death was 24.7% (95%CI: 18.7-31.9). The risk of neurological sequelae among survivors was 50.9% (95%CI: 40.2-61.5). Patients diagnosed in stage III or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive were significantly more likely to die (64.8, 53.4% respectively) during treatment. The frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) acid-fast-bacilli smear positivity was 10.0% (95% CI 5.5-17.6), 23.8% (15.2-35.3) for CSF culture positivity, and 22.3% (17.8-27.5) for CSF polymerase chain reaction positivity. We found that the headache, fever, vomiting, and abnormal chest radiograph were the most common symptoms and diagnostic findings among tuberculous meningitis patients. Conclusions Despite anti-tuberculosis treatment, adult tuberculous meningitis has very poor outcomes. The mortality rate of patients diagnosed in stage III or HIV co-infection increased significantly during treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available