4.4 Article

Stability and bonding nature for icosahedral or planar cluster of hydrogenated boron or aluminum

Journal

AIP ADVANCES
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5111512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MERIT program
  2. Marubun Research Promotion Foundation
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [15K14106, 19H05818]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K14106, 19H05818] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ab initio molecular orbital calculations are performed for B-13(-), Al-13(-), B12H122-, Al12H122-, Si-10, and Si10H16 clusters. The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of stable and unstable clusters is bonding and antibonding orbitals, respectively. The cluster size dependences of the orbital energies are almost the same for B-13(-) and Al-13(-) icosahedral clusters, when the size and the energy are properly normalized. The normalized factors for size and energy are almost coincident with the ratios of those of the atomic outer s orbitals. On the other hand, the most stable size of B-13(-) is smaller than that of Al-13(-), and this ratio of the stable size seems to be affected by the ratio of the sizes of the atomic outer p orbitals. As a result, B-13(-) and Al-13(-) icosahedral clusters have antibonding and bonding orbitals for HOMOs and so are unstable and stable, respectively. The situation for B-13(-) and Al-13(-) planar clusters is opposite to that discussed above for the icosahedral clusters. The orbital energies for the metallic bonding Al-13(-) icosahedral and Si-10 clusters can be reproduced by the Woods-Saxon model; however, those for the unstable B-13(-) icosahedral and covalent bonding B12H122-, Al12H122-, and Si10H16 clusters cannot be reproduced by the Woods-Saxon model. After optimization of the parameters of the Woods-Saxon model for the Al-13(-) icosahedral and Si-10 clusters, the orbital energies are reproduced very well and the sizes and shapes of the potential are reasonable. (C) 2019 Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available