4.5 Article

Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Procedure in Burr-Hole Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Patients of Very Advanced Age

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages E1037-E1046

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.080

Keywords

Burr-hole surgery; Chronic subdural hematoma; Endoscopic procedure; Extremely aged patients; Recurrent risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The usefulness of endoscopic procedures for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has been described, but the indications in patients of very advanced age have not been analyzed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and usefulness of introduction of an endoscopic procedure for such patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 540 CSDHs treated by burr-hole surgery with endoscopic examination. The safety of the endoscopic procedure was assessed according to postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality. The outcome was evaluated by statistical comparison among 4 different age-groups, and the recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence was investigated in patients of very advanced age. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 7 cases (1.5%). The 6-month morbidity and mortality were 13.5% and 4.5%. No complications, morbidity, or mortality associated with the additional endoscopic procedure occurred even in patients of very advanced age. The endoscopic features of trabecular structures and residual septa separating the cavity were also risk factors for recurrence in patients of very advanced age. Releasing of the septa showed the possibility of decreasing the risk of recurrence to 6.6% in patients aged >= 85 years as well as in younger patients. There were some inevitable problems such as prolongation of the surgical time and inadequate endoscopic surgical skill. CONCLUSIONS: An endoscopic procedure for CSDH can be safely indicated and useful even in patients aged >= 85 years. However, clinicians should carefully select the patients based on clinical information associated with risk factors for recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available